🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and others indicate that governments around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.